"In God, as Mind, we Trust" - DAY 356

“In Money we Trust” - continued

Hi everyone

In this Interview-post we’re having a look at the statement ‘In Mind we Trust’. We have now had a look at the relationship between Money and God, where it couldn’t have been more obvious than on Money printing the words “In God we Trust”. In relation to having a look at Actual Reality, it is most certainly more Money that is in fact God within Humanity’s Lives. Meaning - if one have Money and God next to each other, the weighing is definitely in the direction of Money, as Money in this Physical Reality is what Determines Life and Death – even within that determining/defining also your Experience/Mind Reactions to Life and Death. Furthermore, how Money and one’s Experience towards it determines your Mind / ‘Who you are’, such as your Personalities…this I have walked in the beginning of this blog in the first few days explaining the extent to which ‘Who we are’ is/has become dependent on Money and defined according to /as Money.

So, therefore if we really have a look at how God is always also depicted as the Creator, the Created and the Creation – and this is essentially what Money does as well: Money is the Creator that Creates its Creation, which is ‘Who we are’ in our Minds / Consciousness that then determines how/what we Live and how our living comes into Creation or Manifestation – everything is in Direct Relationship to Money. Now getting to the statement “In Mind we Trust”, which is a little bit more of a subtle relationship in terms of How the One statement as “In Hope we Trust” relates to our Statement “In Mind we Trust.”

So here it is actually Multidimensional in the sense that: we have a Hope Character / Personality, which means that there are already existent thought patterns / backchat patterns / reaction patterns and/or behavior patterns that have become ‘Who Self Is’ as the word Hope. In other words the Hope Character/Personality - it is that within your mind that moves you/ directs you into the condition/conditioning of Hope itself. Using for example, Money: in relationship to Money where we tend to go into that Hope and the Trust that - ‘things will work out’ and/or ‘God will Save Humanity’ and in so doing, going into a state of submission, a state of waiting. And how does this then exist within our relationship to our Minds?

Now as I’ve explained we thus already have a ‘Hope character /personality’ in relationship to Money and God, and it’s that Hope Character / personality, which is that part of ourselves/within ourselves that essentially hold us back from taking the reins/responsibility of our minds, our lives, our relationship to money.

So, it is quite interesting if you have a look at this relationship between Money or God because, what both of them are currently doing is that: the majority of humanity is not Taking Responsibility for Life on Earth. The majority of Human Beings is in relationship to Money and God in the state of Hope and Submission – and in that Submission going into a state of Powerlessness, while the Elite are the ones Controlling what? Money. Within this, it kind of comes to question why Religion really then in fact exist, because for most part what it’s Doing is causing Human Beings to Abdicate the Responsibility for/of their lives to God, while the ‘Real God’ that is controlling, determining and directing their lives, which is Money, is being given Free Reign to Create the Life and Living Conditions within this Physical Existence for All of Humanity.

How much do we really in fact consider Our Life, Our Position in terms of the ‘Greater System’? This is economically and politically - the Systems within this World System that is directly responsible for how our life and living is. There we have it as well in terms of the extent to which we are abdicating our lives’ responsibility to these governing systems, exactly as we do with money and God. What is quite fascinating is that all these Governing Systems seems to be Profiting much More than the Majority of humanity. Weren’t these systems’ purposes or reasons for existing to Govern/ to Manage/ to Direct Humanity? Well it doesn’t seem to be going that direction, more seems to be going in the direction of Hoarding All the resources and All the Money only for a few and leaving the majority in a relationship to a False or Fake God and in that relationship not taking responsibility for their lives, their relationship to Money, the Governing systems. Because all the Attention and Focus is being Shifted into an Illusionary God - while the Real God as Money of this Physical Existence is taking over everything.

This then also brings in an interesting point: when you look at the word ‘God’, you see it movies as well, you know ‘Gods’ – ‘Gods’ are entities that possesses a particular Power, a particular Responsibility. So, many for example say: “How Dare You say that Money is God?” or that “The Mind is God” - it’s interpreted as being Blasphemous. But, if you really have a look at the power that Money itself and the entire the World System/ the Money System has - it has a ‘Godhood’ to it in the relationship to Humanity and this Physical Existence as a whole with regards to the power and responsibility it possessed in our existence. So therefore, it’s like really having a look at these relationships, because one can see within these Equations how Religion and God within religion would be a distraction, would be a diversion of attention for Humans to not Realize their ability, their responsibility in relationship to their Real Life in this Real Physical World within this World System and Money system. Then there’s also the point/dimension existent of keeping the attention diverted through the promise of an apparent better ‘Afterlife,’ so then everyone lives for the ‘Afterlife’ and this particular life in this world, in this physical existence is not sorted out/ directed/ taken responsibility for.

So, before I get to the relationship of our minds to hope, let’s first have a look at how our mind is thus God as well. I mean, you can have a look at the extent to which you Trust your Mind and what comes up within it. Human beings trust their Consciousness/ their Mind to such an extent that they would even refuse to Change - despite the evidence of what your thoughts, internal conversation, imaginations do to you, how far things can be taken in your mind, how throughout a certain period of time so many thoughts, backchats and energies etc. accumulate and how that affect other human’s lives; Even despite such evidence and the consequence of it, human beings trust to such a degree that “That is Who I am/ How I am/ What I am” - it’s existent in the same statement which is in the bible as the “I Am That I Am”, like “I am that I am and that’s it”.

So within this, it is fascinating that we then also really have to look at questioning our Trust within Trust meaning that: Can we Trust our Trust? Because, if we have a look at what we’re trusting in in relation to what comes up in the mind without questioning it, without really becoming aware of what it is that we’re accepting and allowing and why we are continuing accepting and allowing the things to come up within the mind that comes up – that Really we have to look at our Nature within that, what is it saying about us? That we’re in an absolute Blind Trust to what comes up in the Mind as being who we are/ what we are/ how we are and that’s kind of it, that we would not Consider Change for Ourselves.

It’s quite fascinating that so many human beings for example say: “Humanity must change and the world must change and things must change”, but what’s not realized is that - it’s fascinating that Humans would not even consider such a change within themselves. For most part - we’ve seen it for ourselves as well in our own process, a point of Fear of Change came up, because we know the extent to which we’re kind of fucked up in the Mind, meaning in relation to the most Bizarre things that can just automatically/suddenly and unexpectedly come up. Obviously many will not publicly admit it, but - you’re now Here, while listening to this interview, alone with yourself so, you can apply a bit of Self Honesty here and really go into your mind and even observe your mind until we do the next interview tomorrow. Just see for yourself the things that can come up in there – and that within that relationship, we know actually the extent to which Change is going to be have to be walked, but a point of fear is that: the extent to which we’re going to change, we will change massively in who we are within our nature, our beingness and our living if we would give ourselves that ability to. Because we know how much needs to change within ourselves, within our minds and our living and so, we tend to kind of go into a Resistance to what comes up within us in the mind and even considering Change, because it just seems ‘too much,’ it just seems ‘so overwhelming’ like: “I’m literally going to have to change Everything of myself” - Yes, we’re going to. Many also for moments reflect and have a look in the mind and it seems like too much, it seems impossible, it seems overwhelming - but the thing I would show you is that: this is what everyone is doing in relationship to themselves – they’re saying “It’s too much/ it’s too overwhelming”. We’re doing the same within this World System/ this Money System. For how long within Human Civilization has that statement been existent as this little voice in the head that says “It’s Too Much”, that says “It’s Impossible”? Who the is that voice speaking? Is it really you? If you really investigate it first for yourself, practically, you know “Who/what that voice is that saying these things, such as “it’s Impossible/ Cannot be Done?” What is that voice protecting, what is the Interest of that voice, what will that voice Gain with you not changing, with you not placing in the Effort, the Discipline and the Labor in relation to Changing Life on Earth for Everyone?

So, I would consider investigating that little voice that comes up in your mind that says “it’s Impossible/ Don’t Do it, No you Can’t do it, You’re Not Ready, it’s too overwhelming, you’re not good enough” and you’ll find an interesting thing: this is what we’ve been walking in Desteni in terms of showing you how to walk through such voices in the head, how to Not Accept and Allow yourself to just listen, but to Investigate, to Understand where/how such things come from. For most part you may even realize that as a kid, how many kids for example have that awareness when you say: “when I grow up I want to be a doctor, because I want to help as many people as possible” and yes, that’s a bit of a smaller scale than humanity as a whole, but - somewhere in our lives that point gets lost or someone just said to you that “That’s too a big a dream” or “You’re never going to be able to help people/ too many people”. Within that, parents then actually limit the child’s insight to seeing a potential to, for example, Help a lot of people in fact. So we’re with Desteni taking one step further to taking Responsibility of Humanity as a Whole.

Alright so - we’re starting walking the process of understanding the statement “In Mind We Trust” and we now opened up the point of Trust to really have a look at how much you Trust that mind of yours and how questionable that is in terms of what kind of stuff can come up in there and go on in there. And to really consider that little voice in the head that comes up - are you really the one saying that “It’s impossible” and “It cannot be done”, when with the Equal Money System and with Desteni we’re practically Proving that it Can in Fact be done – so, the Evidence is Here that it can be done, so what is that little voice doing in your head? Within this I’ll thus in the next interview now open up more dimensions of Trust just to Really Reflect on your Relationship to the Mind and then finally into Hope; I mean How has our Mind become God, what is our relationship to Hope within it and how are we also not directing our own minds, I mean we cannot expect ourselves to be able to Take Responsibility for our lives or to direct it if we can’t even do that within our own Minds, with our own Selves.

Thank you very much.

From Reactive Responses to Self RESPONSE(ability) – (Part Three): DAY 334

(Interview Post Transcription)

Self-Change without using Mind Energy - continued
What will it Take for Human Nature to Change? - continued
From Reactive Responses to Self RESPONSE(ability) - continued
The Fear of Failure and Desire for Success – continued

In this interview post, before we continue with the mind-spirit/being and physical body trinity, I would like to expand on a point that we mentioned in a heading within one of our previous posts that we haven't yet expanded on, which is: from reactive responses to self-response-ability. This is also existent within the context of the equation that we have walked of how our awareness is currently automatically enslaved or existent as a servant or follower of the mind within the equation of participation/observation, then definition/connotation, then reaction. How then from there, from the emotional and feeling response as reaction, as definition, as participation in relationship to what automatically comes up in our mind: it moves us into controlled change. Controlled change, meaning that: consciousness or the mind, or whatever comes up within it - is what controls our change.

Within this as well, that point existent, where, with developing our awareness, we're moving to self-directive change, change within real self-awareness, rather than the controlled change that we exist as now, in how we change from characters or personalities through that relationship equation into a constant continuous positive and negative balancing of polarities. So here I'd like to expand on that reactive responses to self-response-ability. Responsibility being the ability to respond. Now, responding is not a reaction, a responding - within responding to something or someone - it's a clear directive stand or statement that one make of who I am. Notice a response is a showing, is an expression of who I am, therefore the ability to respond is standing within and showing who I am in a moment in relation to something or someone.

So, to have responsibility, to have self-response-ability we first have to get to know, obviously, what that SELF is. What is the ABILITY to RESPOND? And here we're getting to how self-responsibility is a process that we will also become or that will also emerge through walking the process of changing the equation from participation/observation to definition/connection, then to reaction and so to controlled change, where we move to: looking/investigating, to redefinition/re-connotation, to expression, and then to LIVING or to SELF-DIRECTIVE CHANGE.

Now, as we've said within previous interviews, what we first have to establish is - what is SELF, because with self-responsibility self is first, but to be able to be self-responsible, we have to understand what this self is first, you know it doesn't read 'responsibility-self' - if it was 'responsibility-self', then we'd first understand what is ‘responsibility’ and then ‘self’.

So, first and foremost the phases or processes that one is going to be walking are first taking response-ability for the self that one has become as the mind. The self, in terms of all the characters and personalities that currently constitute the ‘who I am’ in relationship to the mind, because that is what your ‘Self’ currently is. And to be able to change that self that we are - I mean more like all the selves, as the characters and personalities that has become as ‘the self as the mind’: to be able to change that, we first have to understand how we created it in the first place, how we exist as it, how we live it, how is it affecting, determining or influencing our living and behavior. That is how one then walk through what we had done in the previous posts like using the lazy/failure character, the writing, the self-forgiveness, the commitments, then the commitments being the changed self, through a decision, through a commitment, through a stand. And that changed self is what you live in physical practical reality.

So here, self-responsibility is quite awesome in the sense that: if we again look at respons(E)-ability, the ability to respond - Now we have to get to that ability, what is that ability? How do I get or have or obtain that ability to respond, to stand, to direct, to show ‘who I am’ in relation to this self or all the selves as the characters or personalities that I have become in relationship to the mind?
So, self-responsibility will assist and support self in one’s process of walking through the characters and personalities, to not react to them, because again: respons(E)-ability, the ability to respond - there is no reaction in it, it is an ability that I have to respond to stand, to show, to look, to investigate, to see ‘who I am’ as the self that I have become as the mind. So, that ability is what one then slowly but surely harness through your writing, your self-forgiveness, and your commitments, because as we have already proven that: through writing, self-forgiveness and commitments - there are no reactions involved. You are walking your self-forgiveness, your writing, understanding how it is that one had created this ‘self’ or these selves as characters or personalities, and within that: one have then the commitments and when one get to the commitments, that is then that response that one have, and one stand as, in relationship to the self as the character or personality. One’s response / ability to respond is then the change that one had established within the commitment statements, that is your existent ability to respond, that self, that you have established, that re-stated, that re-committed ‘who I am’ in relationship to a character or personality.

So therefore, self-responsibility, just within that word opens up quite a multi-dimensional process, for one to consider, and the most important thing within self respons(E)-ability is that there is no reaction, you do not react to yourself, it’s not self-reaction, it’s self-responsibility, the ability to respond to self, and the self that one is existing as is character and personalities.

So, this is a very cool equation to consider, and just to expand on the heading within one of the previous posts, in where all that we’ve done within our relationship to the mind is react, having pre-programmed reactive responses to our own thoughts, memories, emotions/feelings, imaginations, other people that we accept and allow to come up in our minds, you know, images/pictures and things like that…it’s always just been reacting, reacting, reacting, reacting, and then from that reaction going into polarity energies, from polarity energies activating other characters and personalities, and they charge up a certain energy, and then they again in turn activate other characters and personalities, and then from there we jump again, and oh my god! – as how our existence has been within the mind, absolute madness and mayhem.

So, from reactive responses to self respons(E)-ability one now stand in that process of writing, self-forgiveness, and commitments, to establish that ability, that change of/as ‘who I am’, to be able to respond as direct, as change the self as all the characters and personalities that one have accepted and allowed to become, and so self-responsibility becomes a key to actual real self-change.

To realize, for those that has already been walking writing, self-forgiveness and commitments and actually already established this self respons(E)-ability, and how your process will eventually expand when your ‘self’ expands, in terms of:

First it becomes self-responsibility for the self that we’ve become as all the characters and personalities.

Then, one’s process evolve into standing equal and one with the physical, then it’s the physical self and the respons(E)-ability, the ability to respond to your physical as yourself as directing, changing and moving actual physical dimensions.
Then the process emerge more with the self then expanding to humanity and this physical existence, and then the ability to respond to self as humanity as this physical existence and what that would mean, in terms of the ability to respond to the self to take responsibility, to direct, to change, to move into and as the living principle that we stand as, as what is best for all.

Thank you very much.

LIFE-Regulation Practicality (Part Three): DAY 308

 Featured Artwork by: Marlen Vargas Del Razo

 "The Question would be: Do one Wait until it happens to you, or those whom you Love – before you Consider that the System must Change?" - Bernard Poolman http://creationsjourneytolife.blogspot.com/2013/02/day-305-reeva-steenkamp-collateral.html

http://equalmoney.org/

Survival Management vs. LIFE-Regulation - continued

LIFE-Regulation – continued

In this Final Post, regarding LIFE-Regulation – we’re going to have a look at some Practical Living Considerations of how to start walking one’s Process from Morality as ‘Survival Management’ that has kept the Consciousness Personalities in place, and so one’s accepted and allowed relationship to this World System/Money System and abdicating Responsibility in one’s relationship to one’s own Life and so the Life of/for All in/as this Physical Existence – and start being/becoming a Living Example of/as LIFE-Regulation, as follows:

From Good/Right and Bad/Wrong to - ‘What’s Best for All’

Whenever one face a moment, relationship – and one find one’s Mind go into ‘this is Right/Good’ and/or ‘Bad/Wrong’, to in the moment change the cross-reference to: Does that stand within the Principle of/as What’s Best for All, and so Best for me or Not? With the ‘Not’ in fact meaning – will this Decision/Direction produce CONSEQUENCE as compromise in me/my relationship to others, or will this bring forth a Solution and/or how can I structure the Decision/Direction into and as an equal and one Solution for me and/or all involved?

See – already in the above one can see the Change in ‘abdicating Responsibility’ within Morality and actually Taking Self-Responsibility and giving Direction to a moment/decision/direction. Because, in Morality – one would have automatically, essentially, simply Judged a moment/direction/decision through the eyes of Morality. Whereas within LIFE-Regulation, one take Self-Responsibility for the moment/decision/direction, understand it, cross-reference it with/as everything/everyone that is involved and then from there – make an informed, objective, practical Decision with taking ALL things into consideration; and not just immediately going into a reaction of Morality.

Additionally, Morality would take one into a state of mind of only taking into consideration MY Opinion, MY View, MY perception/interpretation and how that makes ME Feel; when in a moment/direction/decision – there’s A LOT more involved/to consider than one’s own Mind Experience, and so the extent to which, consequentially, one Miss so much that is in fact involved with Decision making and Directive Principle in a Moment.

It is like, taking the example of Alcohol/Drugs for example – that can so easily be misconstrued within the Principles of Morality, where the Individual can change it to being ‘Good/Right for ME’, when within the Principle of What’s Best for All – the ME-only disappear, and one actually start considering MORE than JUST ME. So, within the principle of/as what’s best for all – one take ALL things into consideration, and cross-reference for example Alcohol/Drugs, one see that: one can be/become a Potential Danger for oneself and others, as one know one become Unpredictable on Drugs/Alcohol, and that Drugs/Alcohol has contributed to no Personal Advancement/Expansion/Growth within oneself and one’s Life. And so, one take the Self-Responsibility to not accept/allow Alcohol within oneself/one’s World and becoming more directive with those in one’s World that do still use/abuse it with pointing out this One Commonsensical Reality equation: Alcohol/Drugs completely remove one’s awareness / self-directive principle while on it and become thus in this a Danger to self and others and one simply will not / do not accept such Unpredictability of consequence in yourself/your world and will Stop/take Responsibility for such equations in your life where/as you can, in becoming a directive principle of what you accept and allow in your world and what Not.

Then, from here – extend the Responsibility even further, to Investigating the Consequence of Drugs/Alcohol within/on Humanity, and how many human beings resort to such substances, primarily due to life/living conditions and/or especially the Education System and Family/Parental History. Where, they simply did not have an opportunity in this World/Reality and so resorted to Surviving and ‘busying their time’ with Drugs/Alcohol, and/or using Drugs/Alcohol cause they simply do not Understand their Minds/Consciousness as such education do not yet Exist, and rather with Dealing with themselves/their lives – simply suppress it all; and Drugs/Alcohol do just that. And so, a correction needs to be implemented on ALL levels from Family, to Parents, to Education to the ENTIRE System, cause it will be Interesting here, to consider that: how Children/young adults would change if their Lives from the BEGINNING is oriented to UNDERSTANDING their Minds, how to SOLVE things they experience themselves within themselves, orienting Education to LIFE/LIVING Skills, enhancing their skills/talents/abilities and directing their Minds/themselves to contributing to Life on Earth, learning about this Physical Existence, how things work, how Life can be bettered for ALL…in this Drugs and Alcohol would be/become IRRELEVANT as being/living/expressing SELF would be so absolute, nothing else but Self and who I am in/as the moment would be needed to be ‘Self’, Express Self and Enjoy Self. Enjoyment/Fun will become about Self Expression and Participation – rather than the preprogrammed/brainwashed notion of wanting, needing and desiring Substances that only harm/compromise Awareness and Responsibility creating the idea/belief of ‘Enjoyment / Fun’ at the expense of Human Lives.

So, here thus – the Main Principle existent within/as Life Regulation, not looking at situations/relationships/moments within/as/through the Eyes of Morality, and so within/as Reactions of Emotions/Feelings; but to – when/as one face Decisions, for example to: assist and support self to really write out the Decision, who’s involved, what’s involved and how making a decision and directing it/taking responsibility for it, would influence/affect Self/All involved and so also self/all’s Future. In Morality – we tend to make Decisions ‘in the Moment’, the ‘Now’; not seeing, realising and understanding that ALL Decisions one make, affect and define oneself and the rest of one’s Life, and should thus Always take into account as well how a Decision would play out within one’s world/reality and the future to come.

Here I would Strongly suggest Investing in the Interviews Decision Making 101 Part 1 and Decision Making 101 Part 2, within these Interviews is very specifically outlined the Process of Decision Making. Because, within Morality – that’s become a ‘Guideline for Decision-Making’, Morality is used based on emotional/feeling Mind-Reactions/Responses to decisions/moments one may face in one’s World/Reality, and when making decisions in the MIND as the Interview will also Explain, we tend to not take into consideration REALITY and Reality Consequence/outflows/play outs.

So, we Invite you to Join in discussions with regards to the Process of actually taking Responsibility in moments of making Decisions, investing in the suggested interviews above, and start practising and applying LIFE-Regulation, as taking Responsibility for oneself, for decisions, for moments and referencing them within/as the Principle of/as What’s Best for All, and so best for self. To join discussions – visit the Desteni Forum HERE, and we can assist/support with/as this Process of understanding what it means to take SELF-Responsibility, and expand oneself and one’s life into/as a Purpose/Meaning, that extend beyond only limiting oneself within/as the guidelines of Morality that has limited/trapped individuals into/as what Life on Earth is/has become, and start referencing one’s Life/Living within/as the Principle of equality and oneness, standing for all and so for self.

In this, what must be seen, realised and understood is that – for LIFE Regulation to exist, we need to be/become the Living Examples of taking Responsibility/implementing Responsibility for ourselves, our lives and our Future. Thus, we suggest Joining Desteni, participate in discussions in the Forums as we walk the Process of redefining ourselves, our lives and living and so for those to come, in creating/manifesting a Life/Living that does not only exist for Survival, but actual Evolution of the Self.

Featured Art Work by Marlen Vargas Del Razo

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/marlen.delrazo

Youtube:                                

http://www.youtube.com/user/MarlenLife

http://www.youtube.com/user/MarlenVargasDelRazo

Blogs:

http://marlenvargasdelrazo.wordpress.com/