How did a Factual World become infected with Opinions? (Part
3): DAY 447
Problem (continued)
Before we continue with the previous definition for
“infected”, where we have established how we corrupt / affect the integrity as
the wholeness/completeness of facts through Opinions; and in this process –
diminish reality, the factual, physical world through opinions: we’re in this
post going to walk-through the last definition of “infected” at the
relationship between Opinions and Facts. From here, we will bring-through all
three (3) definitions, have a look at practical examples to gain a holistic
perspective of what we in fact do within and as this accepted and allowed
behaviour of ‘infecting facts with opinions’.
The last definition of Infect as per (Random House
Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2013: s.v. “Infect”) within Dictionary.com
that we’re going to have a look at is:
“to imbue with some pernicious belief, opinion, etc.”
Here we have the definition of ‘infect’ as-is in relation to
Opinions, and with having a look at the context we’re walking within the Mind
when it comes to memories: this is what we do to our memories – we infuse our
own memories with Opinions, where both the ‘good and bad’ Opinions have an
outflow-consequence/nature of being pernicious/evil.
Because, if we return to how we have looked at the word evil within previous
posts in this blog (which is the reverse of LIVE): both ‘good and bad’ opinions
are ‘evil’ within the context of how the Opinions will reverse, as in
change/alter/misconstrue REALITY. One will then with ‘good and bad Opinions’
see reality through ‘good Opinions’ and/or ‘bad Opinions’ – veiling
reality/facts within and as the starting point of Opinions. We
do the same with beliefs, for example – if the starting point of our Minds is
existent within the construct of beliefs, we will see through the eyes of
beliefs; and with seeing through the eyes of beliefs, where our Minds can take
us to the extent of creating beliefs within ourselves from/of the Opinions we
hold: we with beliefs – whether good/bad - also imbue reality/facts, which so
also stand within the nature of being ‘evil’ as reversing reality in the Mind
to suit our own self-interest.
Now that we have walked through all three of the following
definitions for “infect” within the context of how we infect reality with
Opinions: let’s bring all three definitions together with what we opened up
within them and have a look at answering the question of these blogs:
What one has to understand with regards to the Mind, is that
it literally takes all constructs within and as it – such as beliefs, opinions,
thoughts, imaginations, reactions and will always align it within itself in
accordance to what will serve it best, meaning: what will produce the most
energy (emotional/feeling reactions) and what will cement your Personalities/Self-Definitions
within Consciousness the most. Therefore, this is what one will find one do
with Opinions: it will always only serve one’s own Mind, Personalities and
Experience and never stand within the reality/factual/physical principle of equality
and oneness as what is best for all. So, in terms of the question “How did a
factual world become infected by opinions” – here we’re having a look at this
first dimension as to ‘what Opinions does for ME’ / ‘what do I get out of it’.
This ME/I point is the epitome of self-interest – therefore, Opinions serve our
self-interest, whereas reality/fact doesn’t serve anything/anyone: it is what
it is and it tends to the whole / all. But, we humans have this innate drive
within us, in and as our Minds to be special/the one/unique/precious – whereas,
with standing within the physical, in equality and oneness as what is best for
all: such self-interest cannot exist.
Therefore, one can for oneself do an experiment to see how
Opinions, both good and bad, serve only the ME/I of the Mind/Consciousness –
have a look at the thoughts/backchat (words/sentences)
that comes up in the Mind in relation to other people, for example: when an
Opinion comes up, which is any/all remarks/statements/views of another person (both
good and bad) and note how, when/as the Opinion comes up – one get an
“experience” out of it, an emotional/feeling movement within the body. And/or
together with the Opinion, one will notice how one’s body/behaviour changes in
a moment – where one’s facial expressions will subtly / obviously change. Such
changes, energetically / behaviourally, indicate how one is in the process of
‘feeding one’s own Personalities in the mind’ based on the Opinion one have of
another within one’s own Mind. To do this practical experiment, you have to
slow yourself down in/as breath – because our Mind, or we in/as our Minds, tends
to move so fast: we don’t realise the extent to which Opinions are in fact
substantiated with an energetic (emotional/feeling) charge and the extent to
which it influence/affect the physical body.
So therefore, one want to move one’s awareness
more into the physical, through utilizing breath, to change one’s relationship from the mind into physical awareness –
to become physically / ‘reality-aware’ of what the Mind, through the construct
of Opinions, in fact does to the body. If one, for example, only feel a
movement in the solar plexus – it means that the Opinion in the Mind simply fed
an emotional/feeling charge. If one’s bodily gestures/mannerism/facial
expressions changed, where there was a distinct physical expression that came
together with the Opinion: it means that the Opinion fed a Personality System
in the Mind. (This process of how
constructs in the Mind feed emotional/feeling bodies and/or Personality Systems
and how to distinguish between the two – we’ll continue more in posts to come).
So for this post, the practical application process – to
become aware of Opinions and its relationship to Personalities and
emotions/feelings, as well as the effects of this on the Physical Body: it’s to
become aware of what changes happens within self and the body the moment an
Opinion arise in/as the Mind.
We’ll continue more in posts to come
Bibliography:
American Psychological Association (APA):
infect.
(n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved August 30, 2013, from
Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infect
Chicago Manual Style (CMS):
infect.
Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infect (accessed: August 30, 2013).
Modern Language Association (MLA):
"infect."
Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. 30 Aug. 2013.
<Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infect>.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
(IEEE):
Dictionary.com,
"infect," in Dictionary.com Unabridged. Source location:
Random House, Inc. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infect. Available: http://dictionary.reference.com. Accessed: August 30, 2013.
BibTeX Bibliography Style (BibTeX)
@article
{Dictionary.com2013,
title = {Dictionary.com Unabridged},
month = {Aug},
day = {30},
year = {2013},
url = {http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infect},
}
title = {Dictionary.com Unabridged},
month = {Aug},
day = {30},
year = {2013},
url = {http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infect},
}
